7 Responses to “Bug & Worm #220”

1. DJ Says:
   November 12th, 2009 at 12:48 am

   Nope, just harvesting tiny grains.

   and tiny souls.

2. Orkahm52 Says:
   November 12th, 2009 at 12:59 am

   The appearance of Death-of-Insects, can mean only one thing… A character is going to die!

   It’s going to be Bug!

   *runs off to spread rumors*

   In all seriousness, I’m rather fond of death personifications so I’m looking forward to seeing where this is going.

3. Orkahm52 Says:
   November 12th, 2009 at 1:02 am

   Just FYI, after posting the above comment, I got a “the page cannot be displayed” error message. It may well be something wrong on my end, however…

4. Chase Says:
   November 13th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

   Shouldn’t “Death for Insects” carry sort of a big magnifying glass instead of a scythe?

5. Amberlyn Says:
   November 13th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

   Now, now, Chase.
   If he is already their size, what does little ‘ol Death for Insects need a big magnifying glass for?

   I think this drawn death is absolutely ADORABLE.
   A heart shaped skull,
   big fat black comfy cloak.

   I challenge your rumors with mine, Orkahm!
   If anybody’s going to die, for sure it will be a sheep.
   Heh. Get it. No one will get any sleep over it.

   ..okay. That was kind of bad.

6. almo Says:
   November 13th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

   I’m not sure where the Page Cannot be Displayed error came from, Orkahm. Sorry about that. The site is on a web server at my work that isn’t super reliable, so it may happen again from time to time.

   Nobody said he was Death of “insects,” did they? Hm…

   Also, the sheep are too wiley for Death.

   Thanks, everyone!

7. Orkahm52 Says:
   November 17th, 2009 at 5:59 am

   Haha, that joke deserves a place in the comic, Amberlyn.

   Well, it was either Death-of-Insects, or Death-of-Small-Things, but then he would put Death-of-Rats* out of a job.

   *Read Terry Pratchett for more info

Leave a Reply